banner



Did The Show "Paranormal Caught On Camera" Change The Days New Episodes Start?

Paranormal Caught on Camera (TV Series 2019– ) Poster

3 /x

Bunch of Idiots Commenting on Other Idiots!

It's funny how many paranormal shows there are. About of them are pretty bad (like this one). Others are really quite skilful, even if they are more often than not faked. The "experts" e'er get me laughing, because they clearly take no clue about what they are talking nigh. Mostly, it'south because they always bring their pseudo-Christian view-points to everything (well-nigh of which is non truthful). They talk about demons and the effects that people volition suffer by interacting with them. Requite these people turbans and crystal balls, and you'd have the same level of "expertise" every bit these people claim to accept. Y'all have to go into these programs with the realization that IT'South A SHOW! Of grade, they're going to try and exercise their all-time to make information technology seem existent and true as possible. Season 2, episode xx got me laughing so difficult at two French investigators, who clearly got someone dressed up in a black outfit and put this person at the cease of a long hallway. Later, you clearly run across this person walking up the staircase in front of them, and and so a really poorly staged "attack" as i of the investigators falls astern as if pulled from backside. If you're going to fake something, at least Try and do a credible job! Most true encounters are niggling more sensations, smells, and perhaps something out of the corner of your eye. Hardly worth putting an hour long testify behind, right? Any true investigator would remain at a haunted location for days (not once overnight). And withal, on these shows, they ever manage to go something. I mean, their batting averages are amazing compared to the lay person! Conspicuously, these "experts" know admittedly nothing about the paranormal. They're given scripts almost what to say to brand things audio equally interesting to the viewer as possible. It's all a load of bull. These people don't know anything more than about the paranormal as they would about what star systems are on the other side of the galaxy. This show is laughable and usually poorly put together. At least observe something that is somewhat entertaining, because this show is not.

18 out of twenty found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

3 /10

Faux or existent

Is information technology me or are the films always and so damn grainy yous can't come across anything which tells me half of these may be faux. I do believe in some paranormal but this show, some stuff is total crap.

40 out of 46 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

two /ten

What?

All you're seeing are videos that have been debunked or faked videos with CGI. So chosen "experts" try to explain and rationalize these ridiculous clips. Grainy CCTV images that wait similar there from the 90'due south or cell phone clips that came from a phone that's 10 years old. Obviously no-one does any actual investigating on these videos or about of them would be relegated to you lot tube garbage. I suppose y'all could fun watching this stuff, only take it all with a grain of salt.

22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

3 /10

Entertaining only annoying

The clips are commonly alright fifty-fifty though many are near likely debunked. Only the "experts" are so annoying. They honey to hear themselves talk and usually simply describe what the viewer is looking at. These "experts" say things like "I have no idea what this could be". Oh, I was under the impression y'all were an practiced in this fake field. One prune was near likely a behave in the woods and not 1 of these clowns even suspected it could be something so easily explainable. Nope, it's Sasquatch or the Goatman or whatever beast they make up. I usually record the show and merely fast-forward by the egotistic jokers.

18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

two /10

Nothing is new. Just repeating same stories

After watching the first couple episodes it became apparent that every story previously reported had been on a previous show. It appears they may put a new story in the middle of all the previous stories. Pretty much a waste matter of time because there is no reason to rampage watch unless you want to see the same things over and over

21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

i /10

Beyond pathetic...

Naught more than than a vehicle for a bunch of second rate podcasters to annunciate themselves. Entertaining only only to run into these 'experts' continually brand fools of themselves...

13 out of fourteen constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Fact checkers demand to be educated

I cannot tell you how oftentimes I lookout man this just to express mirth at the "experts." I feel like this show is a agglomeration of people putting their ii cents in who have no knowledge in animal sounds, electricity problems... ect. Every other episode has a forest scene with a "foreign fauna sound" .. The experts say they accept never heard an animal make this noise... My advice to whomever watches this prove is expect up fisher cats.

40 out of 42 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /ten

Over the tiptop.

Easily created "ghosts" etc. Almost kids could can do that with Adobe Later on Furnishings. A practiced laugh though if you tin can sit through all the STUPID flashing transitions and added "scratched flick" filters. More wosh bang than reality, with only 3 to 5 seconds of the actually footage before a loftier school diploma drop out "expert" pops up with their own "..it could be" estimation of what anybody at home already knows.

14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /ten

Paranormal NOT caught on camera

Don't waste your time with this garbage folks! It is a insult to my intelligence, and will exist to yours, just a compilation of obvious false or debunked videos, some of them I recognised from existence on YouTube years agone. TRASH Tv

21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

iii /10

Largely A HOAX

What is with these paranormal 'Experts' ?? Unfortunately this series is largely rubbish, which detracts from the few truly mystifying occurrences. The idea of the show is to take these existent puzzlers to be mixed in with the colluded 'events' and so as to accept these debunked along with the residual of the evidence.. I mean Susan Slaughter..please..she carries on like the spooked out empty-headed blonde, when she knows full well the idea is to create an air of the ridiculous. Though she couldn't exercise it without the truly listen numbing participation of the obviously invented paranormal by the clueless and the fame seekers.

11 out of 12 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

3 /10

Videos are cool, commentators are idiots

I like to sentry the videos, at that place are some very cool natural phenomenon.

However, the commentators are complete idiots. They have no idea what occam'south razor is.

They see a video, which is a very clear, known, natural phenomenon. A absurd miracle, only nothing mysterious in anyway.

And their Only POSSBILE solution: It tin only be paranormal. 'It HAS to exist ghosts or goblins'. They decline to consider that they are just watching a normal deject formation, or a marsh gas bubble coming through the dirt, or a grainy video that is quite clearly a hoax.

They are every bit bad as 'the conflicting guy', Giorgio A. Tsoukalos. Girogio can see the most normal explainable monument. And in his mind, 'information technology can merely be aliens', he refuses any normal explanation.

In my opinion, none of the commentators are credible, because non a unmarried one of them e'er recognizes a normal earthly phenomenon.

eight out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /10

an embarrassment

I seriously can't empathise why the producers would leave of their mode to embarrass themselves with this utter nonsense unless the program is intended equally a parody. I watched 1 set of ostensible bigfoot films where the "fauna" was and then obviously man, it hurt. The teenage witnesses (which already raises a scarlet flag) imputed a tremendous superlative to the creature, but there were no measurable points of reference. It also exhibited a 100% human gait and, moreover, walked TOWARD the people--something no animal would EVER practice. In a subsequent film, an ostensible creature crawled forth the underside of a Ukrainian bridge. The deviation in contrast from the residuum of the image and the subtle misalignments made it crystal-clear that ii streams were photoshopped together.

What is this intended to attain? The producers succeeded only in coming across as abject liars and utter fools.

21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

ane /10

Debunked/simulated

This show had potential, until they started showing really old videos from the internet that have been 100% debunked or proven/confessed to exist faked. And the panel of "experts" will still sit there and act like we're watching definitive proof of the paranormal. They don't research the footage at all. They never even attempt to explain or deflate them, which ninety% of them have already been for many years. The show is trying too hard to convince you that these videos are unexplained.

37 out of 41 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /10

Ridiculous

This is one of the WORST paranormal serial on TV.

The vast bulk of the videos can very easily be debunked straight abroad, with the rest beingness highly dubious.

The so-called 'experts' are idiots - probably the dregs of the American paranormal community trying to brand names for themselves by coming upward with ignorant - and sometimes downright ridiculous - explanations.

Experts they ain't.

17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /x

Simulated and Manipulated

This is abode video, folks. Therefore anything is possible. Total unconvincing, digitally manipulated garbage. This won't last long...

23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

i /x

This bear witness is a bunch of bull!!

So....the only thing this bear witness is catching on camera is a bunch of balderdash×××t!! I've cried BS on their videos before but this topped the cake: ii videos Manifestly showing a mass release of balloons flying through the air and the show is calling them UFOs. So...I'm waiting for the panel of and so-called experts to say "hey you lot guys its balloons" merely they are ooing and ahhhing over these awesome UFOs. Really?? Really??? I wish I could get dorsum the fourth dimension I wasted watching this pile of fake BS!!! Hey, the average viewer is not as stupid.

19 out of 22 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

3 /x

Punters should leave

The clips on the show tin be intriguing. But for god sake get rid of theses pointless punters commenting on what we all watch. And for the dearest of god bless him but Brian J. Cano is the master of stating the bleeding obvious.

eleven out of 12 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /x

Pure entertainment. That's a fact Jack.

Warning: Spoilers

Unbelievable what the FCC allows to air on this item aqueduct. Put out something worth watching that's educational with real scientific evidence. No demand for simulated experts to talk non-stop about made-up hoaxes/camera tricks. "Did yous hear that?" "Did yous see that?" There'due south absolutely nothing showing in the video/motion picture and at that place's no paranormal audio audio to be heard at all. Please. Become real. Go a life. Do a testify on something really substantial that'due south legit and then you'll finally take a Idiot box plan worth watching.

viii out of 8 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

one /10

Then ridiculous and fake!

Seriously? some stuff on here is just also impaired and fake. Like telephone calls from spirits? gimmie a suspension lol This show is a joke!!

25 out of xxx plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /ten

Virtually all videos take been debunked.

First off, nearly every single video they show has been debunked. But what bothers me more about this is that the so called "experts" do not say, "this has a elementary explination." My gauge is that some of them give real reasoning backside the event but the producers dont desire to put that in the episode considering in there world every video is paranormal.

31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

iv /x

Are you sure they are experts???

If you watch season 2 episode 17 and look at the part near a foursquare UFO. ITS NOT A UFO its was a very cloudy twenty-four hours and the lights effectually the building right bellow it are shining Directly upward around the edifice witch shows the night rectangle in the eye were the light isn't shinning and light all on the out side then the cous of this is from the lights nit from aliens or a portal to a unlike dimension. I don't want to spotter a testify if they don't actually look at the total moving picture and wait directly bellow it to come across lights.

sixteen out of 17 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /10

Stupid, cringe, and embarrassing.

This show showcases clips that are obviously faux, nevertheless these "experts" endeavour super difficult to sound smart and human activity like this mistiness caught on a video filmed by a irish potato is truly a creature or conflicting. Like ok, It's non at all blithe or anything...right..and on superlative of all of that they replay each clip over and over and over. Literally counted around 12 times that they replayed a prune which featured one of the most annoying "creature" sounds e'er. Just an embarrassing show that makes yous feel like an idiot for watching. Screw the producers and the fake experts on this evidence.

12 out of 12 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1 /10

Just Another Dumb Prove

If you like to have any excuse to yell at the Telly for stress relief, you should watch this show.

The commentators and so-called experts are merely a bunch of science-illiterate and/or superstitious schmucks. I'm almost convinced that they are paid to say the most stupid, nonsensical drivel.

I would give this show a negative rating if it were possible.

14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

2 /10

Not true

Flavor 1, episode 16 In this video taken at a football game game the person is shooting the cheerleaders and a supposed spirit runs through. Ii people interviewed for this, including the cheerleader who had been merely thrown in the air, say that this spirit runs through with no one noticing. Not true. Fifty-fifty though the "practiced" says that the spirit runs past two security guards who don't notice him, I can see that they clearly do. When he runs past, the guard closest to him turns and looks directly at him and so the other 1 looks likewise. Pitiful. Not buying it. Not a spirit.

23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink


Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9863048/reviews

Posted by: brucesiderear.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Did The Show "Paranormal Caught On Camera" Change The Days New Episodes Start?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel